|
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 |
|
Comparisons 28-10-2024 Full compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7025 or Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 7025 | 24% |
Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | 29% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | 83% |
Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | 80% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 7025 | 22% |
Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | 27% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 |
Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | Total score | 530286 | 403836 | CPU | 148477 | 113064 | GPU | 201504 | 153464 | MEM | 84843 | 64616 | UX | 95447 | 72691 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 |
Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | Single-Core | 850 | 905 | Multi-Core | 2957 | 3076 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 |
Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2400 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 575 Prime 4x1.5 GHz Kryo 575 Gold | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4666 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 17 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 512 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is 4% better than Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 640 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 256 | 986 | # of Cores | 8 | | # of Shader Units | 256 | 384 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 25.4 | 29.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 54.4 | 45.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.3 | 55.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 53.4 | 38.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 43.6 | 36.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 68.5 | 56.4 | Real Racing 3 | 103.8 | 69.4 | Sniper 3D | 114.5 | 105.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 83.7 | 66.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 59.7 | 63.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 62.6 | 71.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 36 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 355 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 2900 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5 | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 is better: 18 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
| |
|