|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G |
|
Comparisons 28-10-2024 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like AnTuTu, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, PassMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 or Snapdargon 782G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 7300 | 33% |
Snapdargon 782G | 44% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | 87% |
Snapdargon 782G | 79% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 7300 | 31% |
Snapdargon 782G | 42% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
Snapdargon 782G | Total score | 733937 | 615790 | CPU | 205502 | 172419 | GPU | 278895 | 233993 | MEM | 117429 | 98521 | UX | 132099 | 110849 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
Snapdargon 782G | Single-Core | 1080 | 956 | Multi-Core | 3790 | 3478 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
Snapdargon 782G | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2700 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | 4680 millions | Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Prime 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 17 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdargon 782G is 7% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 642L | GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 550 MHz | GFloPS | 1856 | 906.58 | # of Cores | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.7 | 27.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 86.2 | 69.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.1 | 95.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 49.4 | 53.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 75.5 | 59.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 106.2 | 86.3 | Real Racing 3 | 104.5 | 191.4 | Sniper 3D | 114.3 | 210.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 72.6 | 152.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 76.5 | 152.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.8 | 133.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 3270 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2250 MBit/s. | 1600 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5 | QZSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, Galileo, GBeidou, GLONASS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G is better: 15 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdargon 782G SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|