MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
   After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7025 or Dimensity 8200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

24%

Dimensity 8200

71%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

83%

Dimensity 8200

84%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

22%

Dimensity 8200

70%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Dimensity 8200
Total score	530286	994025
CPU	148477	278320
GPU	201504	377731
MEM	84843	159047
UX	95447	178931

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Dimensity 8200
Single-Core	850	1216
Multi-Core	2957	4132

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Dimensity 8200
Frequency	2500 MHz	3100 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	4 nm
Transistors count		8600 millions
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	6400
Memory bandwidth	24	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		1 MB
L2 cache		2 MB
L3 cache		4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8200 is 19% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7025 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	256	912
# of Cores	8	6
# of Shader Units	256
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.4	37.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.4	118.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.3	69.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	53.4	64.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	43.6	100.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	68.5	145.9
Real Racing 3	103.8	141.1
Sniper 3D	114.5	155.5
Need for Speed No Limits	83.7	98.2
Mortal Kombat X	59.7	101.5
CSR Racing 2	62.6	85.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Imagiq 785 ISP
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	2750 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is better: 36
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7025 specs and review.

Dimensity 8200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8200 specs and review.