MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Full testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7025 or MediaTek Dimensity 1300.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

24%

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

57%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

83%

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

22%

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

54%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	MediaTek Dimensity 1300
Total score	530286	801200
CPU	148477	224335
GPU	201504	304453
MEM	84843	128197
UX	95447	144219

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	MediaTek Dimensity 1300
Single-Core	850	1455
Multi-Core	2957	4766

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	MediaTek Dimensity 1300
Frequency	2500 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	6 nm
Transistors count		5800 millions
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	4266
Memory bandwidth	24	32
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		32 KB
L2 cache		320 KB
L3 cache		8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is 16% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7025 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	256	504
# of Cores	8	9
# of Shader Units	256
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.4	31.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.4	94.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.3	56.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	53.4	52.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	43.6	81.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	68.5	117.1
Real Racing 3	103.8	113.7
Sniper 3D	114.5	125.5
Need for Speed No Limits	83.7	79.7
Mortal Kombat X	59.7	82.5
CSR Racing 2	62.6	68.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 29
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7025 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 1300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 specs and review.