MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 or Dimensity 1050.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

33%

Dimensity 1050

41%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

87%

Dimensity 1050

81%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

31%

Dimensity 1050

39%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	Dimensity 1050
Total score	733937	574847
CPU	205502	160957
GPU	278895	218450
MEM	117429	91981
UX	132099	103470

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	Dimensity 1050
Single-Core	1080	1223
Multi-Core	3790	3794

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	Dimensity 1050
Frequency	2500 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions	5600 millions
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	4266
Memory bandwidth	48	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	320 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G610 MC3
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	1856	1008
# of Cores	6	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.7	28.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	86.2	61.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	57.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	49.4	58.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	75.5	48.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.2	75.1
Real Racing 3	104.5	72.5
Sniper 3D	114.3	109.9
Need for Speed No Limits	72.6	92.3
Mortal Kombat X	76.5	83.3
CSR Racing 2	64.8	69.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5	BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1050 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 specs and review.

Dimensity 1050 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 1050 specs and review.