MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Full testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Geekbench, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
   After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7025 or MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

24%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

83%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

22%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Total score	530286	719546
CPU	148477	201463
GPU	201504	273436
MEM	84843	115118
UX	95447	129523

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Single-Core	850	1059
Multi-Core	2957	3716

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Frequency	2500 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count		6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	6400
Memory bandwidth	24	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		128 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is 12% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	256	912
# of Cores	8	6
# of Shader Units	256
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.4	28.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.4	85.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.3	51.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	53.4	47.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	43.6	73.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	68.5	106.8
Real Racing 3	103.8	103.1
Sniper 3D	114.5	113.5
Need for Speed No Limits	83.7	62.6
Mortal Kombat X	59.7	82.1
CSR Racing 2	62.6	67.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 29
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7025 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.