MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Full testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 or MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

33%

MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max

57%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

87%

MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

31%

MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max

56%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
Total score	733937	793065
CPU	205502	222056
GPU	278895	301360
MEM	117429	126886
UX	132099	142757

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
Single-Core	1080	1168
Multi-Core	3790	4095

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
Frequency	2500 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	6400
Memory bandwidth	48	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	640 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max is 10% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	1856	912
# of Cores	6	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.7	31.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	86.2	94.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	55.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	49.4	52.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	75.5	80.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.2	115.8
Real Racing 3	104.5	113.4
Sniper 3D	114.3	123.8
Need for Speed No Limits	72.6	78.2
Mortal Kombat X	76.5	81.1
CSR Racing 2	64.8	67.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max is better: 24
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max specs and review.