MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PassMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7025 or HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

24%

HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S

53%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

83%

HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

22%

HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S

52%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
Total score	530286	738244
CPU	148477	206711
GPU	201504	280524
MEM	84843	118115
UX	95447	132893

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
Single-Core	850	1058
Multi-Core	2957	4040

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
Frequency	2500 MHz	2620 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.62 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1600
Memory bandwidth	24	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is 4% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7025 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Maleoon 910
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	256	2056
# of Cores	8	4
# of Shader Units	256
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.4	29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.4	87.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.3	51.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	53.4	49.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	43.6	75.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	68.5	107.5
Real Racing 3	103.8	105.6
Sniper 3D	114.5	115.4
Need for Speed No Limits	83.7	73.2
Mortal Kombat X	59.7	77.3
CSR Racing 2	62.6	64.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Balong 5G
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7025 specs and review.

HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S specs and review.