Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Unisoc Tiger T618 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Unisoc Tiger T618

Comparisons   08-07-2023
   Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Unisoc Tiger T618, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 or Tiger T618.

 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Unisoc Tiger T618

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon 68521% Tiger T61815%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon 68583% Tiger T61866%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon 68519% Tiger T61812%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon 685 Tiger T618
Total score293373211843
CPU8214459325
GPU11148380491
MEM4693633895
UX5280338140

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon 685 Tiger T618
Single-Core492436
Multi-Core16051747

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon 685 Tiger T618
Frequency2800 MHz2000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration8x2.8 GHz Kryo 2652x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)LPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency21331066
Memory bandwidth2213
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache16 KB
L2 cache256 KB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 685 is 28% better than Tiger T618 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Frequency750 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS312418.78
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units192
Display2520 x 1080 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile25.225.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)55.728.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra60.250.7
Call of Duty: Mobile54.431.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)49.125.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition74.637.2
Real Racing 375.363.4
Sniper 3D96.781.1
Need for Speed No Limits96.660.8
Mortal Kombat X96.473.5
CSR Racing 266.560.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution108 MP48 MP
Dual Camera resolution13 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 365Vivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS6030
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP8, VP9H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modemLTE-7
Download speed390 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationBeidou, Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS, QZSSGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T618 is better: 10
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 685 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Tiger T618 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Snapdragon 685 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra


Tiger T618 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands