|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
|
Comparisons 08-07-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Kompanio 820, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as 3DMark, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 or MediaTek Kompanio 820.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 685 | 21% |
MediaTek Kompanio 820 | 31% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 685 | 83% |
MediaTek Kompanio 820 | 78% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 685 | 19% |
MediaTek Kompanio 820 | 29% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 685 |
MediaTek Kompanio 820 | Total score | 293373 | 434348 | CPU | 82144 | 121620 | GPU | 111483 | 165046 | MEM | 46936 | 69495 | UX | 52803 | 78182 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 685 |
MediaTek Kompanio 820 | Single-Core | 492 | 662 | Multi-Core | 1605 | 2622 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 685 |
MediaTek Kompanio 820 | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.8 GHz Kryo 265 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 22 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 685 is 21% better than MediaTek Kompanio 820 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP5 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 312 | 705.5 | # of Cores | | 5 | # of Shader Units | 192 | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 25.2 | 26.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.7 | 54.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 60.2 | 56.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 54.4 | 41.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 49.1 | 48.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 74.6 | 73.9 | Real Racing 3 | 75.3 | 71.5 | Sniper 3D | 96.7 | 124.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 96.6 | 79.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 96.4 | 81.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 66.5 | 62.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 365 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 390 MBit/s. | 2770 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 1800 MBit/s. | Navigation | Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS, QZSS | Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5 | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 820 is better: 22 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 685 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
MediaTek Kompanio 820 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
| |
|