Comparisons 27-05-2022
Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Dimensity 1050 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Dimensity 1050 | 87% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Dimensity 1050 | 83% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 91% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Dimensity 1050 | 96% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 1050 |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Total score | 574847 | 1021474 | | CPU | 163368 | 163368 | | GPU | 139627 | 139627 | | MEM | 106600 | 106600 | | UX | 93142 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 1050 |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Single-Core | 1223 | 1168 | | Multi-Core | 3794 | 4246 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 1050 |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 3050 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 5600 millions | 8400 millions | | Core configuration | 4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 8 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 7500 | | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 52 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 320 KB | 1024 KB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 32 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 18% better than Dimensity 1050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 | Mali-G710 MC10 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz | | GFloPS | 1008 | 1648 | | # of Cores | 3 | 10 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 320 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1050 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 18
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
|
