 |
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9654P |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9654P and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as WPrime, Handbrake, 7zip, RealBench, Furmark, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, PassMark, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Gears 5, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654P or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654P is 27% better than EPYC 9374F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 134.3 | 173.9 | | Valorant | 152.7 | 197.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 110.7 | | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 185.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 148.2 | | Overwatch | 123.7 | 160.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 136.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 98.8 | | Warzone | 119.1 | 154.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 166.0 | | Valheim | 126.7 | 164.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 9654P | 14% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9374F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654P as it consumes less power: 320W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 469 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 19565 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 887 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 41479 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 2185 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 107871 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 2177 | 4612 | | Multi-Core | 70650 | 158238 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 2319 | 1586 | | Multi-Core | 45439 | 84216 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 96 | | Threads | 64 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000792
100-100000792WOF | 100-000000803
100-100000803WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 37% better than EPYC 9654P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654P has 64 more core than EPYC 9374F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654P is better: 24
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 9654P before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
