 |
AMD EPYC 9334 vs AMD EPYC 9654P |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9334 vs AMD EPYC 9654P and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Prime95, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Blender, RealBench, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Gears 5.
And how good the processors are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654P or AMD EPYC 9334.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9334 | 70% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654P is 28% better than EPYC 9334. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9334 | 75% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 132.6 | 173.9 | | Valorant | 150.7 | 197.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 84.4 | 110.7 | | Apex Legends | 141.6 | 185.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.0 | 148.2 | | Overwatch | 122.0 | 160.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 104.0 | 136.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 75.3 | 98.8 | | Warzone | 117.5 | 154.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 126.6 | 166.0 | | Valheim | 125.0 | 164.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9334 | 35% |
EPYC 9654P | 14% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9334 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654P as it consumes less power: 210W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9334 |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 156 | 469 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8366 | 19565 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 334 | 887 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 17782 | 41479 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 896 | 2185 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46317 | 107871 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9334 |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 2073 | 4612 | | Multi-Core | 67962 | 158238 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9334 |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 2209 | 1586 | | Multi-Core | 43703 | 84216 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9334 |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 96 | | Threads | 64 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 210 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000800
100-100000800WOF | 100-000000803
100-100000803WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9334 is 11% better than EPYC 9654P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654P has 64 more core than EPYC 9334. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9334 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654P is better: 24
However, it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9334 and AMD EPYC 9654P before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9334 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
