 |
AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 9654P |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 9654P and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Blender, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, RealBench, MATLAB, PassMark, Gears 5, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, WPrime, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Prime95, AIDA64.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654P or AMD EPYC 7642.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7642 | 68% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654P is 30% better than EPYC 7642. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7642 | 73% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 129.7 | 173.9 | | Valorant | 147.3 | 197.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.5 | 110.7 | | Apex Legends | 138.5 | 185.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.5 | 148.2 | | Overwatch | 119.3 | 160.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 136.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 98.8 | | Warzone | 114.9 | 154.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 166.0 | | Valheim | 122.3 | 164.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7642 | 13% |
EPYC 9654P | 14% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9654P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7642 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 177 | 469 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7594 | 19565 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 443 | 887 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 16104 | 41479 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 844 | 2185 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 41890 | 107871 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 2404 | 4612 | | Multi-Core | 61546 | 158238 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 918 | 1586 | | Multi-Core | 40836 | 84216 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 96 | | Threads | 96 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000074
100-100000074WOF | 100-000000803
100-100000803WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9654P is 4% better than EPYC 7642 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654P has 48 more core than EPYC 7642. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7642 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654P is better: 33
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7642 and AMD EPYC 9654P before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7642 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
