 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs AMD EPYC 9654P |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs AMD EPYC 9654P tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like UserBenchmark, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Furmark, PassMark, Blender, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Gears 5, 7zip, 3DMark, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654P or Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 58% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654P is 40% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 65% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 114.4 | 173.9 | | Valorant | 130.0 | 197.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.8 | 110.7 | | Apex Legends | 122.2 | 185.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 97.5 | 148.2 | | Overwatch | 105.3 | 160.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 89.7 | 136.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 65.0 | 98.8 | | Warzone | 101.4 | 154.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 109.2 | 166.0 | | Valheim | 107.9 | 164.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 31% |
EPYC 9654P | 14% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410Y is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654P as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 542 | 469 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2515 | 19565 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1292 | 887 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5597 | 41479 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3170 | 2185 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14035 | 107871 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 415 | 4612 | | Multi-Core | 27475 | 158238 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 1397 | 1586 | | Multi-Core | 25909 | 84216 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Announcement date | March 17, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 96 | | Threads | 24 | 192 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 38000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 360 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000803
100-100000803WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9654P is 16% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654P has 84 more core than Xeon Silver 4410Y. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654P is better: 26
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y and AMD EPYC 9654P before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
