|
Intel Core i9-12900F vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|
Processor comparisons 10-01-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-12900F vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, PassMark, RealBench, Gears 5, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Prime95, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator. And how good the processors are in games: - Fortnite
- Valheim
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M or Intel Core i9-12900F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-12900F | 65% |
Xeon Platinum 8260M | 60% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900F is 7% better than Xeon Platinum 8260M. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-12900F | 59% |
Xeon Platinum 8260M | 69% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.5 | 121.9 | Valorant | 118.8 | 138.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.5 | 77.6 | Apex Legends | 111.6 | 130.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.1 | 103.9 | Overwatch | 96.2 | 112.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.9 | 95.6 | DOOM Eternal | 59.4 | 69.3 | Warzone | 92.6 | 108.1 | Assassin's Creed | 99.8 | 116.4 | Valheim | 98.6 | 115.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-12900F | 97% |
Xeon Platinum 8260M | 21% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900F is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8260M since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 165W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 449 | 211 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4734 | 5808 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 750 | 366 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10524 | 14048 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2661 | 1239 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30285 | 35899 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M | Single-Core | 6936 | 2291 | Multi-Core | 51775 | 34071 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M | Single-Core | 1904 | 1071 | Multi-Core | 16188 | 33238 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | LGA3647 | Core name | Alder Lake | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Cores | 16 | 24 | Threads | 24 | 48 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 165 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900F is 39% better than Xeon Platinum 8260M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Platinum 8260M has 8 more core than Core i9-12900F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900F is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M is better: 20 The summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900F and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-12900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|