 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M vs Intel Core i9-9940X |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M vs Intel Core i9-9940X tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering, video editing. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, 7zip, PassMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, Prime95, SuperPi, RealBench, Blender, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9940X or Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Platinum 8260M | 60% |
Core i9-9940X | 58% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Platinum 8260M is 3% better than Core i9-9940X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Platinum 8260M | 69% |
Core i9-9940X | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 121.9 | 104.5 | Valorant | 138.5 | 118.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 77.6 | 66.5 | Apex Legends | 130.2 | 111.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 103.9 | 89.1 | Overwatch | 112.2 | 96.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 95.6 | 82.0 | DOOM Eternal | 69.3 | 59.4 | Warzone | 108.1 | 92.7 | Assassin's Creed | 116.4 | 99.8 | Valheim | 115.0 | 98.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Platinum 8260M | 21% |
Core i9-9940X | 25% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-9940X is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8260M since it has less power consumption: 165W vs. 165W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
Intel Core i9-9940X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 211 | 197 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5808 | 2587 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 366 | 457 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14048 | 5912 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1239 | 1175 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 35899 | 20834 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
Intel Core i9-9940X | Single-Core | 2291 | 2589 | Multi-Core | 34071 | 28183 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
Intel Core i9-9940X | Single-Core | 1071 | 1257 | Multi-Core | 33238 | 16211 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
Intel Core i9-9940X | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | October 01, 2018 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | LGA3647 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Cascade Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 2 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 24 | 14 | Threads | 48 | 28 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 7510 millions | 8600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 165 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 85 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 35.75 MB | 19.25 MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-9940X is 30% better than Xeon Platinum 8260M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Platinum 8260M has 10 more core than Core i9-9940X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9940X is better: 10 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and Intel Core i9-9940X before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Core i9-9940X Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
| |
|