|
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7313 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7313 and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Handbrake, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, 7zip, Prime95, Furmark, PassMark, SuperPi, Blender, RealBench. And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 6434H | 62% |
EPYC 7313 | 62% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Gold 6434H | 64% |
EPYC 7313 | 68% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.1 | 120.0 | Valorant | 128.5 | 136.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.9 | 76.4 | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 128.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 102.3 | Overwatch | 104.1 | 110.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.6 | 94.1 | DOOM Eternal | 64.2 | 68.2 | Warzone | 100.2 | 106.4 | Assassin's Creed | 107.9 | 114.6 | Valheim | 106.6 | 113.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Gold 6434H | 27% |
EPYC 7313 | 30% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6434H as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 155W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 886 | 124 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2879 | 5029 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1976 | 229 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7114 | 10661 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1374 | 564 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40535 | 27719 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Single-Core | 12581 | 1268 | Multi-Core | 41263 | 40658 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Single-Core | 1615 | 1399 | Multi-Core | 24562 | 31411 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Announcement date | March 11, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 8 | 16 | Threads | 16 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 155 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000329 100-100000329WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434H is 18% better than EPYC 7313 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7313 has 8 more core than Xeon Gold 6434H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434H is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313 is better: 20 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 6434H and AMD EPYC 7313 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7313 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|