 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 9334 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 9334 and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, 7zip, Gears 5, SuperPi, Prime95, PCMark 10, Furmark, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, 3DMark, Blender, PassMark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9334 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 6434H | 62% |
EPYC 9334 | 70% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9334 is 11% better than Xeon Gold 6434H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 6434H | 64% |
EPYC 9334 | 75% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.1 | 132.6 | | Valorant | 128.5 | 150.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.9 | 84.4 | | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 141.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 113.0 | | Overwatch | 104.1 | 122.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.6 | 104.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.2 | 75.3 | | Warzone | 100.2 | 117.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.9 | 126.6 | | Valheim | 106.6 | 125.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 6434H | 27% |
EPYC 9334 | 35% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9334 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6434H as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 210W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 886 | 156 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2879 | 8366 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1976 | 334 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7114 | 17782 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1374 | 896 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40535 | 46317 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Single-Core | 12581 | 2073 | | Multi-Core | 41263 | 67962 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Single-Core | 1615 | 2209 | | Multi-Core | 24562 | 43703 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Announcement date | March 11, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 32 | | Threads | 16 | 64 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 210 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000800
100-100000800WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434H is 27% better than EPYC 9334 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9334 has 24 more core than Xeon Gold 6434H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434H is better: 10
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9334 is better: 23
All the data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 6434H and AMD EPYC 9334 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9334 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
