 |
AMD EPYC 7773X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7773X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6434H and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, MATLAB, 7zip, AIDA64, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, SuperPi, PCMark 10, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6434H or AMD EPYC 7773X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7773X | 74% |
Xeon Gold 6434H | 62% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 16% better than Xeon Gold 6434H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7773X | 80% |
Xeon Gold 6434H | 64% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 142.2 | 113.1 | | Valorant | 161.6 | 128.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.5 | 71.9 | | Apex Legends | 151.9 | 120.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.2 | 96.4 | | Overwatch | 130.9 | 104.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.5 | 88.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.8 | 64.2 | | Warzone | 126.0 | 100.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.7 | 107.9 | | Valheim | 134.1 | 106.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7773X | 16% |
Xeon Gold 6434H | 27% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7773X as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 195W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 886 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9889 | 2879 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 481 | 1976 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 24485 | 7114 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1115 | 1374 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54474 | 40535 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H | | Single-Core | 2797 | 12581 | | Multi-Core | 79901 | 41263 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H | | Single-Core | 1385 | 1615 | | Multi-Core | 53124 | 24562 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 11, 2023 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA4677 | | Core name | Milan | Sapphire Rapids | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 8 | | Threads | 128 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 36000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 195 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 22.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000504
100-000000504​WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434H is 40% better than EPYC 7773X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 56 more core than Xeon Gold 6434H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434H is better: 13
However, it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7773X and Intel Xeon Gold 6434H before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
