 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as 3DMark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Blender, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, WPrime, Handbrake, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6246R or Intel Xeon Gold 5416S.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 5416S | 64% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 59% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 5416S is 7% better than Xeon Gold 6246R. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Gold 5416S | 66% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 62% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 116.9 | 109.5 | Valorant | 132.8 | 124.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 74.4 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 124.9 | 117.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 99.6 | 93.4 | Overwatch | 107.6 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91.7 | 85.9 | DOOM Eternal | 66.4 | 62.2 | Warzone | 103.6 | 97.1 | Assassin's Creed | 111.6 | 104.6 | Valheim | 110.2 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Gold 5416S | 26% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 16% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5416S is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6246R as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1024 | 179 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3295 | 5252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2267 | 397 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8125 | 12359 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1579 | 1059 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46229 | 29861 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 14358 | 2365 | Multi-Core | 47058 | 30393 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 1186 | 1041 | Multi-Core | 28321 | 21110 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Announcement date | March 24, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 16 | 16 | Threads | 32 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 205 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6246R is 41% better than Xeon Gold 5416S in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6246R is better: 6 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 5416S and Intel Xeon Gold 6246R before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|