 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 7502 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 7502 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, 3DMark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, VeraCrypt, RealBench, WPrime, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, PassMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7502 or Intel Xeon Gold 5416S.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 5416S | 64% |
EPYC 7502 | 66% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7502 is 3% better than Xeon Gold 5416S. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Gold 5416S | 66% |
EPYC 7502 | 73% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 116.9 | 129.9 | Valorant | 132.8 | 147.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 74.4 | 82.7 | Apex Legends | 124.9 | 138.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 99.6 | 110.7 | Overwatch | 107.6 | 119.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91.7 | 101.9 | DOOM Eternal | 66.4 | 73.8 | Warzone | 103.6 | 115.2 | Assassin's Creed | 111.6 | 124.0 | Valheim | 110.2 | 122.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Gold 5416S | 26% |
EPYC 7502 | 17% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5416S is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7502 since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 180W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1024 | 160 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3295 | 6608 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2267 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8125 | 14007 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1579 | 740 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46229 | 36424 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 14358 | 2094 | Multi-Core | 47058 | 53430 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 1186 | 939 | Multi-Core | 28321 | 41117 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Announcement date | March 24, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 32 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 180 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000054 100-100000054WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7502 is 19% better than Xeon Gold 5416S in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7502 has 16 more core than Xeon Gold 5416S. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is better: 14
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7502 is better: 20 Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 5416S and AMD EPYC 7502 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7502 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|