 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 9334 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 9334 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as 7zip, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, MATLAB, SuperPi, PassMark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Prime95, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Blender, Gears 5, RealBench, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9334 or Intel Xeon Gold 5416S.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 5416S | 64% |
EPYC 9334 | 70% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9334 is 8% better than Xeon Gold 5416S. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 5416S | 66% |
EPYC 9334 | 75% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 116.9 | 132.6 | | Valorant | 132.8 | 150.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 74.4 | 84.4 | | Apex Legends | 124.9 | 141.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 99.6 | 113.0 | | Overwatch | 107.6 | 122.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91.7 | 104.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 66.4 | 75.3 | | Warzone | 103.6 | 117.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 111.6 | 126.6 | | Valheim | 110.2 | 125.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 5416S | 26% |
EPYC 9334 | 35% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9334 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 5416S since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 210W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1024 | 156 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3295 | 8366 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2267 | 334 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8125 | 17782 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1579 | 896 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46229 | 46317 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Single-Core | 14358 | 2073 | | Multi-Core | 47058 | 67962 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Single-Core | 1186 | 2209 | | Multi-Core | 28321 | 43703 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Announcement date | March 24, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.7 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 32 | | Threads | 32 | 64 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 210 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000800
100-100000800WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9334 is 25% better than Xeon Gold 5416S in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9334 has 16 more core than Xeon Gold 5416S. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is better: 9
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9334 is better: 24
Although it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 5416S and AMD EPYC 9334 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9334 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
