 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 7252 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 7252 and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, AIDA64, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Furmark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, Blender, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 7zip, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7252 or Intel Xeon Gold 5416S.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 5416S | 64% |
EPYC 7252 | 55% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 5416S is 14% better than EPYC 7252. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 5416S | 66% |
EPYC 7252 | 58% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 116.9 | 103.4 | | Valorant | 132.8 | 117.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 74.4 | 65.8 | | Apex Legends | 124.9 | 110.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 99.6 | 88.1 | | Overwatch | 107.6 | 95.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91.7 | 81.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 66.4 | 58.7 | | Warzone | 103.6 | 91.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 111.6 | 98.7 | | Valheim | 110.2 | 97.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 5416S | 26% |
EPYC 7252 | 27% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7252 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 5416S since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 120W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7252 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1024 | 242 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3295 | 1856 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2267 | 433 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8125 | 4126 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1579 | 1482 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46229 | 11071 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7252 | | Single-Core | 14358 | 1615 | | Multi-Core | 47058 | 19724 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7252 | | Single-Core | 1186 | 1001 | | Multi-Core | 28321 | 15066 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
AMD EPYC 7252 | | Announcement date | March 24, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 8 | | Threads | 32 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 42000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 120 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 85 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000080
100-100000080WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7252 is 35% better than Xeon Gold 5416S in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Gold 5416S has 8 more core than EPYC 7252. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is better: 28
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7252 is better: 6
However, it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 5416S and AMD EPYC 7252 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7252 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
