|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H vs AMD EPYC 7502 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-01-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H vs AMD EPYC 7502 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as SuperPi, AIDA64, 7zip, MATLAB, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Blender, WPrime, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7502 or AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H | 60% |
EPYC 7502 | 66% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7502 is 9% better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H | 56% |
EPYC 7502 | 73% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 98.7 | 129.9 | Valorant | 112.2 | 147.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.8 | 82.7 | Apex Legends | 105.5 | 138.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.1 | 110.7 | Overwatch | 90.9 | 119.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.4 | 101.9 | DOOM Eternal | 56.1 | 73.8 | Warzone | 87.5 | 115.2 | Assassin's Creed | 94.2 | 124.0 | Valheim | 93.1 | 122.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H | 116% |
EPYC 7502 | 17% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7502 as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 180W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 326 | 160 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3152 | 6608 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 758 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6910 | 14007 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1882 | 740 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19232 | 36424 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 4201 | 2094 | Multi-Core | 34768 | 53430 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 1575 | 939 | Multi-Core | 10523 | 41117 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Server | Socket | FP7 | SP3 | Core name | Rembrandt | Rome | Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 2 | Generation | 6 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 8 | 32 | Threads | 16 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 7200 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 180 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 4MB | | L3 cache | 16MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000054 100-100000054WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is 24% better than EPYC 7502 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7502 has 24 more core than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7502 is better: 20 Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and AMD EPYC 7502 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
AMD EPYC 7502 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|