Processor comparisons 10-01-2022 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-12900KF vs AMD EPYC 7502 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like WPrime, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Furmark, Prime95, VeraCrypt, RealBench, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Handbrake, Geekbench 5.2, 7zip, 3DMark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Blender, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. And how good the processors are in games: - Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7502 or Intel Core i9-12900KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core i9-12900KF | 75% |
EPYC 7502 | 74% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900KF is 1% better than EPYC 7502. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-12900KF | 68% |
EPYC 7502 | 86% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 119.7 | 151.5 | Valorant | 136.0 | 172.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 76.2 | 96.4 | Apex Legends | 127.9 | 161.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 102.0 | 129.2 | Overwatch | 110.2 | 139.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.9 | 118.8 | DOOM Eternal | 68.0 | 86.1 | Warzone | 106.1 | 134.3 | Assassin's Creed | 114.3 | 144.7 | Valheim | 112.9 | 142.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-12900KF | 52% |
EPYC 7502 | 17% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900KF is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7502 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 180W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 474 | 160 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4996 | 6608 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 792 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11107 | 14007 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2809 | 740 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 31962 | 36424 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 7320 | 2094 | Multi-Core | 54642 | 53430 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 1967 | 939 | Multi-Core | 20514 | 41117 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-12900KF |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Alder Lake | Rome | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 12 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 24 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 180 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 14 MB | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000054 100-100000054WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900KF is 35% better than EPYC 7502 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7502 has 16 more core than Core i9-12900KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900KF is better: 18
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7502 is better: 19 However, it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-12900KF and AMD EPYC 7502 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Valorant gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • Fortnite gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Roblox gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7502 • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7502 • EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7502 • EPYC 7742 Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7502 • EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7502 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7502
|