 |
Intel Core i7-13700 vs AMD EPYC 7502 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-10-2022 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-13700 vs AMD EPYC 7502 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as SuperPi, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Furmark, Prime95, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Gears 5, WPrime, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Blender, Blender, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7502 or Intel Core i7-13700.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13700 | 65% |
EPYC 7502 | 66% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7502 is 1% better than Core i7-13700. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13700 | 61% |
EPYC 7502 | 73% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 109.1 | 129.9 | Valorant | 123.9 | 147.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.4 | 82.7 | Apex Legends | 116.5 | 138.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 93.0 | 110.7 | Overwatch | 100.4 | 119.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.5 | 101.9 | DOOM Eternal | 62.0 | 73.8 | Warzone | 96.7 | 115.2 | Assassin's Creed | 104.1 | 124.0 | Valheim | 102.9 | 122.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13700 | 56% |
EPYC 7502 | 17% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13700 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7502 since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 180W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13700 |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 459 | 160 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4740 | 6608 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 760 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10525 | 14007 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2669 | 740 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30269 | 36424 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13700 |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 2441 | 2094 | Multi-Core | 51586 | 53430 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13700 |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 2118 | 939 | Multi-Core | 20651 | 41117 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13700 |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Announcement date | September 24, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rome | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 24 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 180 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000054 100-100000054WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13700 is 40% better than EPYC 7502 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7502 has 16 more core than Core i7-13700. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7502 is better: 20 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13700 and AMD EPYC 7502 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 7502 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|