|
Intel Core i5-13600K vs AMD EPYC 7502 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13600K vs AMD EPYC 7502 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, PassMark, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, 7zip, Prime95, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Blender, Blender, Furmark. And how good the processors are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7502 or Intel Core i5-13600K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600K | 64% |
EPYC 7502 | 66% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7502 is 3% better than Core i5-13600K. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600K | 60% |
EPYC 7502 | 73% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 106.5 | 129.9 | Valorant | 121.0 | 147.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 67.8 | 82.7 | Apex Legends | 113.7 | 138.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 90.8 | 110.7 | Overwatch | 98.0 | 119.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 83.5 | 101.9 | DOOM Eternal | 60.5 | 73.8 | Warzone | 94.4 | 115.2 | Assassin's Creed | 101.6 | 124.0 | Valheim | 100.4 | 122.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600K | 54% |
EPYC 7502 | 17% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600K is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7502 since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 180W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600K |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 400 | 160 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4282 | 6608 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 673 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 9530 | 14007 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2405 | 740 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 27440 | 36424 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600K |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 2197 | 2094 | Multi-Core | 46776 | 53430 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600K |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 2049 | 939 | Multi-Core | 18118 | 41117 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600K |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Announcement date | September 23, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rome | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 14 | 32 | Threads | 20 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 180 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | y | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000054 100-100000054WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600K is 35% better than EPYC 7502 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7502 has 18 more core than Core i5-13600K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600K is better: 18
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7502 is better: 19 All the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD EPYC 7502 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13600K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 7502 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|