 |
AMD EPYC 9224 vs AMD EPYC 9654 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9224 vs AMD EPYC 9654 and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Furmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Prime95, PCMark 10, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654 or AMD EPYC 9224.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9224 | 65% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654 is 34% better than EPYC 9224. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9224 | 68% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 120.6 | 176.0 | | Valorant | 137.0 | 200.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 76.7 | 112.0 | | Apex Legends | 128.8 | 188.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 102.8 | 150.0 | | Overwatch | 111.0 | 162.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 94.5 | 138.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 68.5 | 100.0 | | Warzone | 106.9 | 156.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 115.1 | 168.0 | | Valheim | 113.7 | 166.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9224 | 27% |
EPYC 9654 | 13% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9224 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654 as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9224 |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 130 | 495 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6125 | 20361 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 260 | 930 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 13002 | 43157 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 670 | 2281 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33841 | 112225 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9224 |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 1530 | 4805 | | Multi-Core | 49648 | 164622 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9224 |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 1629 | 1502 | | Multi-Core | 31932 | 86274 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9224 |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 96 | | Threads | 48 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 64MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000939
| 100-000000789
100-100000789WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9224 is 4% better than EPYC 9654 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654 has 72 more core than EPYC 9224. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9224 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654 is better: 23
Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9224 and AMD EPYC 9654 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9224 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
