 |
AMD EPYC 7573X vs AMD EPYC 9654 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7573X vs AMD EPYC 9654 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, 3DMark, Furmark, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, SuperPi, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, PassMark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654 or AMD EPYC 7573X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7573X | 68% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654 is 31% better than EPYC 7573X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7573X | 73% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 129.7 | 176.0 | | Valorant | 147.4 | 200.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.6 | 112.0 | | Apex Legends | 138.6 | 188.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.6 | 150.0 | | Overwatch | 119.4 | 162.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 138.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 100.0 | | Warzone | 115.0 | 156.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 168.0 | | Valheim | 122.4 | 166.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7573X | 19% |
EPYC 9654 | 13% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7573X is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654 since it has less power consumption: 240W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 495 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7427 | 20361 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 930 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15754 | 43157 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 824 | 2281 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40983 | 112225 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 1745 | 4805 | | Multi-Core | 60122 | 164622 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 1400 | 1502 | | Multi-Core | 40906 | 86274 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7573X |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Milan | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 96 | | Threads | 64 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 76000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000506
100-000000506​WOF | 100-000000789
100-100000789WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7573X is 14% better than EPYC 9654 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654 has 64 more core than EPYC 7573X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7573X is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654 is better: 31
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7573X and AMD EPYC 9654 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7573X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
