 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Core i5-3210M |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Core i5-3210M and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Blender, MATLAB, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, PCMark 10, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Gears 5, Blender, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, 3DMark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-3210M or Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Core i5-3210M | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Core i5-3210M | 50% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.2 | 89.5 | | Valorant | 101.4 | 101.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 57.0 | | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 95.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 76.3 | | Overwatch | 82.1 | 82.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 70.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 50.9 | | Warzone | 79.1 | 79.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 85.4 | | Valheim | 84.2 | 84.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
Core i5-3210M | 66% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-3210M is more energy efficient than the Core2 Extreme Q9200 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Core i5-3210M | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 107 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 174 | 256 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 107 | 231 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 353 | 534 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 269 | 576 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 990 | 1373 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Core i5-3210M | | Single-Core | 1069 | 1545 | | Multi-Core | 2004 | 2429 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Core i5-3210M | | Single-Core | 367 | 693 | | Multi-Core | 1217 | 1489 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Core i5-3210M | | Announcement date | November 07, 2008 | January 01, 2012 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | LGA775 | PGA988B | | Core name | Yorkfield | Ivy Bridge | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | | 3.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 5 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm | | Transistors count | 456 millions | 2400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 35 W | | Memory type | | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | 25.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 6 Mb | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 3 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-3210M is 4% better than Core2 Extreme Q9200 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 2 more core than Core i5-3210M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-3210M is better: 32
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Core i5-3210M before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Core i5-3210M Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
