 |
Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, 3DMark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, PCMark 10, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, RealBench, SuperPi, PassMark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 or Intel Core i3-6102E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-6102E | 50% |
Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-6102E | 50% |
Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.1 | 89.2 | | Valorant | 101.3 | 101.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.7 | 56.8 | | Apex Legends | 95.2 | 95.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.0 | 76.1 | | Overwatch | 82.0 | 82.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.9 | 70.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.6 | 50.7 | | Warzone | 79.0 | 79.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.1 | 85.2 | | Valheim | 84.1 | 84.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-6102E | 68% |
Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-6102E is more energy efficient than the Core2 Extreme Q9200 as it consumes less power: 25W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-6102E |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 92 | 48 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 239 | 174 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 235 | 107 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 555 | 353 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 395 | 269 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1533 | 990 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-6102E |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 | | Single-Core | 1057 | 1069 | | Multi-Core | 2356 | 2004 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-6102E |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 | | Single-Core | 510 | 367 | | Multi-Core | 1109 | 1217 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-6102E |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 | | Announcement date | October 07, 2015 | November 07, 2008 | | Type | Embedded | Desktop | | Socket | FCBGA1440 | LGA775 | | Core name | Skylake | Yorkfield | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | | | | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 1333 MHz | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm | | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 456 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 25 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 6 Mb | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core2 Extreme Q9200 is 20% better than Core i3-6102E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 2 more core than Core i3-6102E. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-6102E is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 16
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-6102E and Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-6102E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
|
|
|
