 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs AMD 3015e |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs AMD 3015e and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like RealBench, PCMark 10, Gears 5, Furmark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Blender, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, PassMark, 7zip, Prime95, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD 3015e or Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
3015e | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
3015e | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.2 | 89.0 | | Valorant | 101.4 | 101.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 56.6 | | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 95.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 75.8 | | Overwatch | 82.1 | 81.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 69.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 50.5 | | Warzone | 79.1 | 78.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 84.9 | | Valheim | 84.2 | 83.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
3015e | 294% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the 3015e is more energy efficient than the Core2 Extreme Q9200 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 6W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
AMD 3015e | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 48 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 174 | 256 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 107 | 122 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 353 | 557 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 269 | 315 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 990 | 1515 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
AMD 3015e | | Single-Core | 1069 | 1422 | | Multi-Core | 2004 | 2669 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
AMD 3015e | | Single-Core | 367 | 530 | | Multi-Core | 1217 | 941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
AMD 3015e | | Announcement date | November 07, 2008 | July 06, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | LGA775 | FT5 | | Core name | Yorkfield | Dali | | Architecture | x86 | Zen | | Generation | 6 | 1 | | Turbo Frequency | | 2.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 1.2 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 1333 MHz | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 456 millions | 800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 6 W | | Memory type | | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 6 Mb | 1MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 4MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | AM3015BRP2OFJ
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core2 Extreme Q9200 is 50% better than 3015e in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 2 more core than 3015e. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD 3015e is better: 15
Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and AMD 3015e before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
AMD 3015e Processor Comparisons
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
