 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron 6305 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron 6305 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, MATLAB, Prime95, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, SuperPi, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Blender, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Gears 5, RealBench, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Blender.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron 6305 or Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron 6305 | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron 6305 | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.2 | 89.2 | | Valorant | 101.4 | 101.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 56.8 | | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 95.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 76.1 | | Overwatch | 82.1 | 82.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 70.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 50.7 | | Warzone | 79.1 | 79.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 85.2 | | Valheim | 84.2 | 84.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
Celeron 6305 | 0% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core2 Extreme Q9200 is more energy efficient than the Celeron 6305 as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 0W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron 6305 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 118 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 174 | 210 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 107 | 291 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 353 | 497 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 269 | 300 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 990 | 1106 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron 6305 | | Single-Core | 1069 | 1241 | | Multi-Core | 2004 | 2239 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron 6305 | | Single-Core | 367 | 654 | | Multi-Core | 1217 | 1217 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron 6305 | | Announcement date | November 07, 2008 | January 01, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA1449 | | Core name | Yorkfield | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | | | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 1.8 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 2 | | Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 456 millions | 2030 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | | | Memory type | | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 6 Mb | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core2 Extreme Q9200 is 25% better than Celeron 6305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 2 more core than Celeron 6305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 6305 is better: 17
However, it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron 6305 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Celeron 6305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
|
|
|
