|
Intel Core i5-3210M vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-3210M vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Blender, SuperPi, Gears 5, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Handbrake, MATLAB, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, PassMark, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, 3DMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD FX-6300 Six-Core or Intel Core i5-3210M.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-3210M | 50% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, FX-6300 Six-Core is 1% better than Core i5-3210M. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-3210M | 50% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.5 | 90.8 | Valorant | 101.7 | 103.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.0 | 57.8 | Apex Legends | 95.6 | 97.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.3 | 77.4 | Overwatch | 82.4 | 83.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.2 | 71.2 | DOOM Eternal | 50.9 | 51.6 | Warzone | 79.3 | 80.5 | Assassin's Creed | 85.4 | 86.7 | Valheim | 84.4 | 85.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-3210M | 66% |
FX-6300 Six-Core | 22% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-3210M is more energy efficient than the FX-6300 Six-Core since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 95W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-3210M |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 107 | 89 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 256 | 648 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 231 | 186 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 534 | 1176 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 576 | 567 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1373 | 3624 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-3210M |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 1545 | 1463 | Multi-Core | 2429 | 4132 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-3210M |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Single-Core | 693 | 652 | Multi-Core | 1489 | 2781 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-3210M |
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core | Announcement date | January 01, 2012 | October 01, 2012 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | PGA988B | AM3+ | Core name | Ivy Bridge | Vishera | Architecture | x86 | Bulldozer | Generation | 3 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 6 | Threads | 4 | | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 2400 millions | 1220 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 95 W | Memory type | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 288KB | L2 cache | | 6MB | L3 cache | 3 MB | 8MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here FX-6300 Six-Core is 28% better than Core i5-3210M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that FX-6300 Six-Core has 4 more core than Core i5-3210M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-3210M is better: 14
The number of parameters for which AMD FX-6300 Six-Core is better: 24 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-3210M and AMD FX-6300 Six-Core before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-3210M Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|