 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron N4020 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron N4020 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, 7zip, Prime95, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Blender, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, RealBench, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Furmark, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N4020 or Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron N4020 | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron N4020 | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.2 | 88.9 | | Valorant | 101.4 | 101.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 56.6 | | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 95.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 75.8 | | Overwatch | 82.1 | 81.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 69.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 50.5 | | Warzone | 79.1 | 78.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 84.9 | | Valheim | 84.2 | 83.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
Celeron N4020 | 263% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N4020 is more energy efficient than the Core2 Extreme Q9200 as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 6W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 76 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 174 | 145 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 107 | 88 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 353 | 289 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 269 | 220 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 990 | 811 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Single-Core | 1069 | 1185 | | Multi-Core | 2004 | 1641 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Single-Core | 367 | 475 | | Multi-Core | 1217 | 931 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Announcement date | November 07, 2008 | January 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA1090 | | Core name | Yorkfield | Gemini Lake Refresh | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | | 2.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 1.1 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 2 | | Bus rate | 1333 MHz | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 456 millions | 1400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 6 W | | Memory type | | DDR4/LPDDR4 (SRET0) up to 2400 MT/s DDR4 (SRKLL) up to 2400 MT/s | | Max. Memory | | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 6 Mb | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core2 Extreme Q9200 is 54% better than Celeron N4020 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 2 more core than Celeron N4020. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N4020 is better: 11
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron N4020 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs A6-9550
Intel Celeron N4020 Processor Comparisons
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
