 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron J3455E |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron J3455E and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, WPrime, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Prime95, Handbrake, RealBench, PassMark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, 7zip.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron J3455E or Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron J3455E | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron J3455E | 50% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Control, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.2 | 89.2 | | Valorant | 101.4 | 101.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 56.7 | | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 95.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 76.0 | | Overwatch | 82.1 | 82.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 69.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 50.7 | | Warzone | 79.1 | 79.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 85.1 | | Valheim | 84.2 | 84.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
Celeron J3455E | 107% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron J3455E is more energy efficient than the Core2 Extreme Q9200 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 10W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron J3455E | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 103 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 174 | 247 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 107 | 222 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 353 | 514 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 269 | 555 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 990 | 1322 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron J3455E | | Single-Core | 1069 | 872 | | Multi-Core | 2004 | 2339 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron J3455E | | Single-Core | 367 | 323 | | Multi-Core | 1217 | 1139 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron J3455E | | Announcement date | November 07, 2008 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA1296 | | Core name | Yorkfield | Apollo Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | | 2.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 1.5 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 1333 MHz | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 456 millions | 1300 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 10 W | | Memory type | | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s
LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | | Max. Memory | | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 6 Mb | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core2 Extreme Q9200 is 37% better than Celeron J3455E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron J3455E is better: 15
Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron J3455E before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Celeron J3455E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
