|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C vs Intel Core i5-3210M |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 3 3250C vs Intel Core i5-3210M and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Gears 5, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Prime95, Blender, Furmark, WPrime, PassMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-3210M or AMD Ryzen 3 3250C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 3 3250C | 51% |
Core i5-3210M | 50% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 3 3250C is 1% better than Core i5-3210M. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 3 3250C | 51% |
Core i5-3210M | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 89.5 | Valorant | 102.1 | 101.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 57.0 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 95.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 76.3 | Overwatch | 82.7 | 82.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 70.2 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 50.9 | Warzone | 79.6 | 79.3 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 85.4 | Valheim | 84.8 | 84.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 3 3250C | 193% |
Core i5-3210M | 66% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 3250C is more energy efficient than the Core i5-3210M as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3250C |
Intel Core i5-3210M | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 142 | 107 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 354 | 256 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 318 | 231 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 774 | 534 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 573 | 576 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2346 | 1373 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3250C |
Intel Core i5-3210M | Single-Core | 1946 | 1545 | Multi-Core | 4330 | 2429 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3250C |
Intel Core i5-3210M | Single-Core | 871 | 693 | Multi-Core | 1825 | 1489 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 3 3250C |
Intel Core i5-3210M | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | January 01, 2012 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | PGA988B | Core name | Dali | Ivy Bridge | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 1 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | 3800 millions | 2400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | Memory type | | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 25.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 192KB | | L2 cache | 1MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 3 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM325CC4T2OFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 3250C is 3% better than Core i5-3210M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-3210M is better: 6 Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 3 3250C and Intel Core i5-3210M before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U
Intel Core i5-3210M Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|