 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron N4500 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron N4500 and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 3DMark, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, 7zip, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Gears 5, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PassMark, AIDA64, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, VeraCrypt, Prime95.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N4500 or Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron N4500 | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron N4500 | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.2 | 89.2 | | Valorant | 101.4 | 101.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 56.8 | | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 95.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 76.0 | | Overwatch | 82.1 | 82.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 69.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 50.7 | | Warzone | 79.1 | 79.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 85.2 | | Valheim | 84.2 | 84.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
Celeron N4500 | 337% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N4500 is more energy efficient than the Core2 Extreme Q9200 as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 6W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 71 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 174 | 189 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 107 | 153 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 353 | 459 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 269 | 333 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 990 | 1222 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | | Single-Core | 1069 | 1002 | | Multi-Core | 2004 | 2472 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | | Single-Core | 367 | 608 | | Multi-Core | 1217 | 1184 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | | Announcement date | November 07, 2008 | January 11, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA1338 | | Core name | Yorkfield | Jasper Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | | 2.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 1.1 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 1333 MHz | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 456 millions | 1400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 6 W | | Memory type | | DDR4 LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 6 Mb | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core2 Extreme Q9200 is 54% better than Celeron N4500 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N4500 is better: 16
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron N4500 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Celeron N4500 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
|
|
|
