|
AMD A6-9550 vs Intel Core i5-3210M |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD A6-9550 vs Intel Core i5-3210M tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Blender, PassMark, Blender, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Furmark, Handbrake, 3DMark, SuperPi, WPrime, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-3210M or AMD A6-9550.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
A6-9550 | 50% |
Core i5-3210M | 50% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.A6-9550 | 50% |
Core i5-3210M | 50% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.0 | 89.5 | Valorant | 101.1 | 101.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.6 | 57.0 | Apex Legends | 95.0 | 95.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 75.8 | 76.3 | Overwatch | 81.9 | 82.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.8 | 70.2 | DOOM Eternal | 50.6 | 50.9 | Warzone | 78.9 | 79.3 | Assassin's Creed | 84.9 | 85.4 | Valheim | 83.9 | 84.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
A6-9550 | 28% |
Core i5-3210M | 66% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-3210M is more energy efficient than the A6-9550 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD A6-9550 |
Intel Core i5-3210M | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 109 | 107 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 226 | 256 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 267 | 231 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 357 | 534 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 527 | 576 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 733 | 1373 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD A6-9550 |
Intel Core i5-3210M | Single-Core | 1737 | 1545 | Multi-Core | 1976 | 2429 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD A6-9550 |
Intel Core i5-3210M | Single-Core | 549 | 693 | Multi-Core | 951 | 1489 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD A6-9550 |
Intel Core i5-3210M | Announcement date | July 27, 2017 | January 01, 2012 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | AM4 | PGA988B | Core name | Bristol Ridge | Ivy Bridge | Architecture | Excavator | x86 | Generation | 7 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | | 4 | Bus rate | | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | | 2400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | | 25.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | 1MB | | L3 cache | | 3 MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | AD9550AGM23AB AD9550AGABBOX
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A6-9550 is 34% better than Core i5-3210M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD A6-9550 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-3210M is better: 26 Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD A6-9550 and Intel Core i5-3210M before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD A6-9550 Processor Comparisons • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i5-3210M Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|