 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron N5100 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron N5100 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Furmark, Handbrake, SuperPi, RealBench, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, 7zip, AIDA64, Blender.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5100 or Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron N5100 | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron N5100 | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.2 | 89.9 | | Valorant | 101.4 | 102.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 57.2 | | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 96.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 76.6 | | Overwatch | 82.1 | 82.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 70.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 51.1 | | Warzone | 79.1 | 79.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 85.8 | | Valheim | 84.2 | 84.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
Celeron N5100 | 338% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5100 is more energy efficient than the Core2 Extreme Q9200 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 6W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N5100 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 94 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 174 | 248 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 107 | 202 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 353 | 603 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 269 | 437 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 990 | 1604 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N5100 | | Single-Core | 1069 | 1316 | | Multi-Core | 2004 | 3246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N5100 | | Single-Core | 367 | 610 | | Multi-Core | 1217 | 1869 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron N5100 | | Announcement date | November 07, 2008 | January 11, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA1338 | | Core name | Yorkfield | Jasper Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | | 2.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 1.1 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 1333 MHz | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 456 millions | 2800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 6 W | | Memory type | | DDR4 LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 6 Mb | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core2 Extreme Q9200 is 54% better than Celeron N5100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5100 is better: 29
Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron N5100 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Celeron N5100 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs 3015e
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Core i5-2500K
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
|
|
|
