Intel Celeron G5920 vs Intel Core i5-3210M

Processor comparisons   17-03-2021
   For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Celeron G5920 vs Intel Core i5-3210M and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as SuperPi, 3DMark, PassMark, Gears 5, MATLAB, 7zip, Blender, Prime95, AIDA64, Handbrake, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, VeraCrypt.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Fallout 76
Overwatch
Rainbow Six Siege
Death Stranding
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
Grand Theft Auto V
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Last Man Standing
Watch Dogs Legion
Apex Legends
Red Dead Redemption 2
Halo Infinite
Valheim
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Valorant
Cyberpunk 2077
Fortnite
Borderlands 3
DOOM: Eternal

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-3210M or Intel Celeron G5920.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Celeron G5920

50%

Core i5-3210M

50%

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Celeron G5920

50%

Core i5-3210M

50%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	89.7	89.5
Valorant	102.0	101.7
Cyberpunk 2077	57.1	57.0
Apex Legends	95.8	95.6
Call of Duty Warzone	76.5	76.3
Overwatch	82.6	82.4
Red Dead Redemption 2	70.4	70.2
DOOM Eternal	51.0	50.9
Warzone	79.5	79.3
Assassin's Creed	85.7	85.4
Valheim	84.6	84.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Celeron G5920

50%

Core i5-3210M

66%

To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-3210M is more energy efficient than the Celeron G5920 as it consumes less power: 58W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	Intel Celeron G5920	Intel Core i5-3210M
Cinbench 15 Single-core	149	107
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	266	256
Cinbench 20 Single-core	368	231
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	628	534
Cinbench 23 Single-core	379	576
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	1398	1373

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Celeron G5920	Intel Core i5-3210M
Single-Core	2146	1545
Multi-Core	2831	2429

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Celeron G5920	Intel Core i5-3210M
Single-Core	878	693
Multi-Core	1697	1489

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

	Intel Celeron G5920	Intel Core i5-3210M
Announcement date	October 01, 2020	January 01, 2012
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Socket	FCLGA1200	PGA988B
Core name	Comet Lake	Ivy Bridge
Architecture	x86	x86
Generation	5	3
Turbo Frequency		3.1 MHz
Frequency	3.5 MHz	2.5 MHz
Cores	2	2
Threads	2	4
Bus rate	8 GT/s	5 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Transistors count	2460 millions	2400 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	58 W	35 W
Memory type	DDR4-2666	DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Max. Memory	128 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	2 MB	3 MB
Overclocking	No	Yes
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron G5920 is 28% better than Core i5-3210M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron G5920 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-3210M is better: 6
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Celeron G5920 and Intel Core i5-3210M before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.

• Intel Celeron G5920 specs and review.

• Intel Core i5-3210M specs and review.

Intel Celeron G5920 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y

Intel Core i5-3210M Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y