 |
AMD Athlon PRO 200U vs Intel Core i5-3210M |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Athlon PRO 200U vs Intel Core i5-3210M and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Blender, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, RealBench, MATLAB, PassMark, Gears 5, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, WPrime, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Prime95, AIDA64.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-3210M or AMD Athlon PRO 200U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Athlon PRO 200U | 51% |
Core i5-3210M | 50% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Athlon PRO 200U is 1% better than Core i5-3210M. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Athlon PRO 200U | 51% |
Core i5-3210M | 50% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.8 | 89.5 | | Valorant | 102.0 | 101.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.1 | 57.0 | | Apex Legends | 95.9 | 95.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.5 | 76.3 | | Overwatch | 82.6 | 82.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.4 | 70.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.0 | 50.9 | | Warzone | 79.6 | 79.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.7 | 85.4 | | Valheim | 84.7 | 84.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Athlon PRO 200U | 185% |
Core i5-3210M | 66% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Athlon PRO 200U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-3210M since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Athlon PRO 200U |
Intel Core i5-3210M | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 131 | 107 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 366 | 256 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 308 | 231 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 772 | 534 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 489 | 576 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2355 | 1373 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon PRO 200U |
Intel Core i5-3210M | | Single-Core | 1748 | 1545 | | Multi-Core | 4150 | 2429 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon PRO 200U |
Intel Core i5-3210M | | Single-Core | 835 | 693 | | Multi-Core | 1728 | 1489 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Athlon PRO 200U |
Intel Core i5-3210M | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | January 01, 2012 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP5 | PGA988B | | Core name | Raven Ridge | Ivy Bridge | | Architecture | Zen | x86 | | Generation | 1 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | | 5 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm | | Transistors count | 1600 millions | 2400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | | Memory type | | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 25.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 192KB | | | L2 cache | 1MB | | | L3 cache | 4MB | 3 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | YM200UC4T2OFB
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-3210M is 8% better than Athlon PRO 200U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon PRO 200U is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-3210M is better: 8
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Athlon PRO 200U and Intel Core i5-3210M before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Athlon PRO 200U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core i5-6442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i3-8109U
• Vs Core i3-8121U
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Athlon Gold 7220U
• Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
Intel Core i5-3210M Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
