 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron G5920 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 vs Intel Celeron G5920 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Gears 5, AIDA64, Blender, Prime95, RealBench, Blender, 7zip, 3DMark, SuperPi, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron G5920 or Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 50% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.2 | 89.7 | | Valorant | 101.4 | 102.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 57.1 | | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 95.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 76.5 | | Overwatch | 82.1 | 82.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 70.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 51.0 | | Warzone | 79.1 | 79.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 85.7 | | Valheim | 84.2 | 84.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core2 Extreme Q9200 | 27% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron G5920 is more energy efficient than the Core2 Extreme Q9200 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 58W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron G5920 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 149 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 174 | 266 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 107 | 368 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 353 | 628 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 269 | 379 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 990 | 1398 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron G5920 | | Single-Core | 1069 | 2146 | | Multi-Core | 2004 | 2831 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron G5920 | | Single-Core | 367 | 878 | | Multi-Core | 1217 | 1697 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 |
Intel Celeron G5920 | | Announcement date | November 07, 2008 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Yorkfield | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 5 | | Turbo Frequency | | | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 2 | | Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 456 millions | 2460 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 58 W | | Memory type | | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 6 Mb | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron G5920 is 31% better than Core2 Extreme Q9200 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 2 more core than Celeron G5920. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron G5920 is better: 29
Although it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron G5920 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Celeron G5920 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
