Intel Core i3-7102E vs Intel Celeron 6305

Processor comparisons   20-01-2022
   Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-7102E vs Intel Celeron 6305 and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like RealBench, Handbrake, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, WPrime, Blender, Blender, 7zip, PassMark, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Furmark.
   And how good the CPUs are in games:

Valheim
Death Stranding
Red Dead Redemption 2
Rainbow Six Siege
Fortnite
Overwatch
Halo Infinite
Watch Dogs Legion
Apex Legends
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
Valorant
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Borderlands 3
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM: Eternal
Grand Theft Auto V
Fallout 76
Last Man Standing
Assassin's Creed Valhalla

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron 6305 or Intel Core i3-7102E.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Core i3-7102E

50%

Celeron 6305

50%

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Core i3-7102E

50%

Celeron 6305

50%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	89.1	89.2
Valorant	101.2	101.4
Cyberpunk 2077	56.7	56.8
Apex Legends	95.2	95.3
Call of Duty Warzone	75.9	76.1
Overwatch	82.0	82.1
Red Dead Redemption 2	69.9	70.0
DOOM Eternal	50.6	50.7
Warzone	79.0	79.1
Assassin's Creed	85.0	85.2
Valheim	84.0	84.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Core i3-7102E

75%

Celeron 6305

To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-7102E is more energy efficient than the Celeron 6305 since it has less power consumption: 25W vs. 0W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	Intel Core i3-7102E	Intel Celeron 6305
Cinbench 15 Single-core	99	118
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	256	210
Cinbench 20 Single-core	252	291
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	595	497
Cinbench 23 Single-core	424	300
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	1645	1106

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Core i3-7102E	Intel Celeron 6305
Single-Core	1279	1241
Multi-Core	2528	2239

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Core i3-7102E	Intel Celeron 6305
Single-Core	568	654
Multi-Core	1074	1217

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

	Intel Core i3-7102E	Intel Celeron 6305
Announcement date	March 07, 2017	January 01, 2021
Type	Embedded	Laptop
Socket	FCBGA1440	FCBGA1449
Core name	Kaby Lake	Tiger Lake
Architecture	x86	x86
Generation	7	11
Turbo Frequency
Frequency	2.1 MHz	1.8 MHz
Cores	2	2
Threads	4	2
Bus rate		4 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Transistors count	2000 millions	2030 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	25 W
Memory type	DDR4-2400	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733
Max. Memory	64 Gb	64 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth	34.1 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	3 MB	4 MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	Yes	No
Part number	Expansion Options

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-7102E is 14% better than Celeron 6305 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7102E is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 6305 is better: 22
Although it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-7102E and Intel Celeron 6305 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

Intel Core i3-7102E - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• Intel Core i3-7102E specs and review.

• Intel Celeron 6305 specs and review.

Intel Core i3-7102E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Celeron N4020

Intel Celeron 6305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c