|
Intel Pentium Gold G6405U vs Intel Celeron 6305 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Pentium Gold G6405U vs Intel Celeron 6305 and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, 7zip, RealBench, Furmark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Blender, Handbrake, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Gears 5, AIDA64. Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron 6305 or Intel Pentium Gold G6405U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Pentium Gold G6405U | 51% |
Celeron 6305 | 50% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Pentium Gold G6405U is 1% better than Celeron 6305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Pentium Gold G6405U | 51% |
Celeron 6305 | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 89.2 | Valorant | 102.1 | 101.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 56.8 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 95.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 76.1 | Overwatch | 82.7 | 82.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 70.0 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 50.7 | Warzone | 79.7 | 79.1 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 85.2 | Valheim | 84.8 | 84.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Pentium Gold G6405U | 132% |
Celeron 6305 | 0% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Pentium Gold G6405U is more energy efficient than the Celeron 6305 since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 0W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Pentium Gold G6405U |
Intel Celeron 6305 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 137 | 118 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 346 | 210 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 343 | 291 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 777 | 497 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 509 | 300 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1715 | 1106 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium Gold G6405U |
Intel Celeron 6305 | Single-Core | 2078 | 1241 | Multi-Core | 3388 | 2239 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium Gold G6405U |
Intel Celeron 6305 | Single-Core | 598 | 654 | Multi-Core | 1833 | 1217 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Pentium Gold G6405U |
Intel Celeron 6305 | Announcement date | March 18, 2021 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1449 | Core name | Comet Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 2 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 2030 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Pentium Gold G6405U is 25% better than Celeron 6305 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium Gold G6405U is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 6305 is better: 6 Although it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Pentium Gold G6405U and Intel Celeron 6305 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Pentium Gold G6405U Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i5-2500K
Intel Celeron 6305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
| |
|