|
Intel Pentium N6415 vs Intel Celeron 6305 |
|
Processor comparisons 28-06-2021 Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Pentium N6415 vs Intel Celeron 6305 and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like WPrime, Prime95, Furmark, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, PassMark, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, 7zip, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, RealBench, 3DMark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi. And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron 6305 or Intel Pentium N6415.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Pentium N6415 | 51% |
Celeron 6305 | 50% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Pentium N6415 is 1% better than Celeron 6305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Pentium N6415 | 50% |
Celeron 6305 | 50% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.4 | 89.2 | Valorant | 101.6 | 101.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.9 | 56.8 | Apex Legends | 95.5 | 95.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.2 | 76.1 | Overwatch | 82.3 | 82.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.1 | 70.0 | DOOM Eternal | 50.8 | 50.7 | Warzone | 79.3 | 79.1 | Assassin's Creed | 85.4 | 85.2 | Valheim | 84.4 | 84.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Pentium N6415 | 378% |
Celeron 6305 | 0% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Pentium N6415 is more energy efficient than the Celeron 6305 as it consumes less power: 6W vs. 0W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Pentium N6415 |
Intel Celeron 6305 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 122 | 118 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 440 | 210 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 207 | 291 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 679 | 497 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 514 | 300 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1896 | 1106 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium N6415 |
Intel Celeron 6305 | Single-Core | 1976 | 1241 | Multi-Core | 3840 | 2239 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium N6415 |
Intel Celeron 6305 | Single-Core | 681 | 654 | Multi-Core | 1416 | 1217 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Pentium N6415 |
Intel Celeron 6305 | Announcement date | January 01, 2016 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Embedded | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1493 | FCBGA1449 | Core name | Elkhart Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 7 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 3 MHz | | Frequency | 1.2 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 2 | Bus rate | | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 1400 millions | 2030 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | | Memory type | 4x32 LPDDR4/x 3200MT/s Max 16GB / 2x64 DDR4 3200MT/s Max 32GB | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron 6305 is 33% better than Pentium N6415 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Pentium N6415 has 2 more core than Celeron 6305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium N6415 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 6305 is better: 9 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Pentium N6415 and Intel Celeron 6305 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Pentium N6415 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Celeron 6305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
| |
|