|
Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Core i5-7200U |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Core i5-7200U tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PCMark 10, SuperPi, PassMark, Gears 5, Prime95, MATLAB, 7zip, 3DMark, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, UserBenchmark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Fortnite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-7200U or Intel Celeron 6305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron 6305 | 50% |
Core i5-7200U | 51% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-7200U is 1% better than Celeron 6305. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron 6305 | 50% |
Core i5-7200U | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.2 | 90.0 | Valorant | 101.4 | 102.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 57.3 | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 96.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.1 | 76.7 | Overwatch | 82.1 | 82.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.0 | 70.6 | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.1 | 79.8 | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 85.9 | Valheim | 84.2 | 84.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron 6305 | 0% |
Core i5-7200U | 192% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-7200U is more energy efficient than the Celeron 6305 since it has less power consumption: 0W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron 6305 |
Intel Core i5-7200U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 118 | 132 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 210 | 334 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 291 | 308 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 497 | 652 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 300 | 817 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1106 | 1978 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron 6305 |
Intel Core i5-7200U | Single-Core | 1241 | 1807 | Multi-Core | 2239 | 3391 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron 6305 |
Intel Core i5-7200U | Single-Core | 654 | 864 | Multi-Core | 1217 | 1952 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Celeron 6305 |
Intel Core i5-7200U | Announcement date | January 01, 2021 | October 01, 2016 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1449 | FCBGA1356 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Kaby Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 7 | Turbo Frequency | | 3.1 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 2 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2030 millions | 1810 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-7200U is 28% better than Celeron 6305 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 6305 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-7200U is better: 26 Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Celeron 6305 and Intel Core i5-7200U before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Celeron 6305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
Intel Core i5-7200U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|