Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Celeron 6305

Processor comparisons   20-01-2022
   If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Celeron 6305 and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Gears 5, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, 7zip, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Prime95, WPrime, Blender, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Blender, 3DMark, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Rainbow Six Siege
Cyberpunk 2077
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Halo Infinite
Grand Theft Auto V
Overwatch
DOOM: Eternal
Watch Dogs Legion
Last Man Standing
Death Stranding
Fortnite
Valorant
Fallout 76
Apex Legends
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
Valheim
Red Dead Redemption 2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Borderlands 3

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron 6305 or Intel Core i3-6102E.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Core i3-6102E

50%

Celeron 6305

50%

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Core i3-6102E

50%

Celeron 6305

50%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	89.1	89.2
Valorant	101.3	101.4
Cyberpunk 2077	56.7	56.8
Apex Legends	95.2	95.3
Call of Duty Warzone	76.0	76.1
Overwatch	82.0	82.1
Red Dead Redemption 2	69.9	70.0
DOOM Eternal	50.6	50.7
Warzone	79.0	79.1
Assassin's Creed	85.1	85.2
Valheim	84.1	84.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Core i3-6102E

68%

Celeron 6305

To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-6102E is more energy efficient than the Celeron 6305 since it has less power consumption: 25W vs. 0W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	Intel Core i3-6102E	Intel Celeron 6305
Cinbench 15 Single-core	92	118
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	239	210
Cinbench 20 Single-core	235	291
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	555	497
Cinbench 23 Single-core	395	300
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	1533	1106

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Core i3-6102E	Intel Celeron 6305
Single-Core	1057	1241
Multi-Core	2356	2239

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Core i3-6102E	Intel Celeron 6305
Single-Core	510	654
Multi-Core	1109	1217

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	Intel Core i3-6102E	Intel Celeron 6305
Announcement date	October 07, 2015	January 01, 2021
Type	Embedded	Laptop
Socket	FCBGA1440	FCBGA1449
Core name	Skylake	Tiger Lake
Architecture	x86	x86
Generation	6	11
Turbo Frequency
Frequency	1.9 MHz	1.8 MHz
Cores	2	2
Threads	4	2
Bus rate	8 GT/s	4 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Transistors count	2000 millions	2030 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	25 W
Memory type	DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733
Max. Memory	64 Gb	64 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth	34.1 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	3 MB	4 MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	Yes	No
Part number	Expansion Options

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-6102E is 5% better than Celeron 6305 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-6102E is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 6305 is better: 22
Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-6102E and Intel Celeron 6305 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.

Intel Core i3-6102E - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• Intel Core i3-6102E specs and review.

• Intel Celeron 6305 specs and review.

Intel Core i3-6102E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Celeron N4020

Intel Celeron 6305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c