|
Intel Core i5-13500 vs Intel Core i9-12900TE |
|
Processor comparisons 12-10-2022 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13500 vs Intel Core i9-12900TE and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, Handbrake, 7zip, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, PCMark 10, Prime95, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Blender, PassMark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB. Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900TE or Intel Core i5-13500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500 | 61% |
Core i9-12900TE | 65% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900TE is 6% better than Core i5-13500. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500 | 59% |
Core i9-12900TE | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.0 | 103.9 | Valorant | 118.2 | 118.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.2 | 66.1 | Apex Legends | 111.1 | 110.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.6 | 88.5 | Overwatch | 95.7 | 95.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.6 | 81.4 | DOOM Eternal | 59.1 | 59.0 | Warzone | 92.2 | 92.1 | Assassin's Creed | 99.3 | 99.1 | Valheim | 98.1 | 98.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500 | 94% |
Core i9-12900TE | 174% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900TE is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500 |
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 336 | 432 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3353 | 4547 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 549 | 721 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7434 | 10110 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1895 | 2556 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 21360 | 29091 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500 |
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Single-Core | 1732 | 6663 | Multi-Core | 36394 | 49735 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500 |
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Single-Core | 1846 | 1829 | Multi-Core | 15694 | 15550 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13500 |
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Announcement date | September 23, 2022 | July 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Embedded | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 14 | 16 | Threads | 20 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 14 MB | L3 cache | 20 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900TE is 30% better than Core i5-13500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900TE has 2 more core than Core i5-13500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900TE is better: 15 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13500 and Intel Core i9-12900TE before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-12900TE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX
| |
|